![]() “Clearly the community needed to be convinced that pixilation is bad, and a tool to un-redact is the best way to do it.” The tool “But you see it all the time out there on the internet, often by journalists. He told The Daily Swig: “It’s just not a secure way to redact information,” he explained. ![]() “Sometimes, people like to be clever and try some other redaction techniques like blurring, swirling, or pixilation,” lead researcher Dan Petro wrote. Insecureīishop Fox has a “long-standing policy” to only redact information using black bars, which the company says is the only secure way technique. In a blog post, lead researcher Dan Petro, who wrote the tool, explained that it was created in order to complete a challenge set by Jumspec, and also due to the use of pixilation being a “pet peeve” of his. To demonstrate that pixilation is “a no-good, bad, insecure, surefire way to get your sensitive data leaked”, it was designed to take redacted pixelized text and reverse it back into its reveal the supposedly hidden “clear text”. ![]() The tool, called Unredacter, was released by Bishop Fox today (February 15). Researchers have demonstrated how a new tool can uncover redacted text from documents, potentially exposing sensitive information to nefarious actors. Developer warns that redaction method is insecure
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |